,

R.I.P. Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The game is turned upside again. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a liberal Justice and a heroine of female empowerment died on Friday. Which is, for Republicans, who preach the sanctity of life above of all, is just a side note next to the event of real importance: a Supreme Court seat has just freed up. Mitch McConnell didn't miss a beat and vowed to fill the vacancy with a conservative judge. In 2016 McConnel denied Obama the nomination of a new Justice, nine months before the election on the grounds that it's improper to fill up a Supreme Court seat in an election year. Lindsay Graham said it on tape that it's a matter of principle, and the Democrats can use his own words against him if they shoe ever gets on the other foot. Today it did,  and the flagship of the moderate Right, the National Review, argues that those words don't count, because the 2016 explanation was only the second most important argument against the nomination. Or maybe because it was the second Tuesday of the month.

No one is surprised, but it's hard to suppress the gag-reflex.

How does it affect the coming elections and what does it say about the GOP? First of all, I think there are two, seemingly competing, agendas in the GOP. One is Trump's, who obviously wants reelection. The other is of the Republican leadership, most notably Mitch McConnell - whose job description has always been delivering judges and being a sanctimonious prick. If they kept the nomination open until after the election, that could be used to force the reluctant Republicans to vote again for Trump. This is what Trump would want, I think. On the other hand, the fact the McConnell and Graham acted so quickly and firmly suggests that they don't trust in their chances to be around after 2021 January. They want to cement their legacy while they still can.

What particularly irks me is that if the GOP gets their third Justice, they will use it in decades to come as a justification for the 4-year whoring for Trump. Yeah, it was ugly, but we did it for the higher good. Gag-reflex again.

As for how it affects the election, I think no one knows. It can energize Republican voters who can feel redeemed. It can also give them the excuse to sit out this election - we got 3 Justices, that was worth it, but it's enough. It can fill Democrat voters with noble rage and drive them to the voting booths. Or, maybe most probably, it won't have an effect at all. Maybe the Supreme Court is only relevant for the top 5% of informed voters.


Can Trump win?

It might be a sign of addiction, but few things concern me as much nowadays, personal life included, as the result of the 2020 American presidential election. I honestly think a Trump-reelection would be a genuine disaster for America and for the world as well. The damage to American society and the world order would take a generation to heal, if ever. But the topic of this article is not doom-mongering or melodrama, but looking at the odds of a Trump-reelection. I can't resist the thrill of taking whatever I have learned in the last four years and putting it all on the red. Well, blue - I root for a Trump-defeat.

I expect Biden to win, and with very good chances, by a large margin. But I'm not sure, and neither are most of the those who root for him. Almost every pundit and expert was burnt by the combination of Trump and Brexit in 2016, and as a result, everyone is very cautious and risk-averse in predictions. 

So, with as much dispassion as I can muster, I make an attempt to list the pros and cons for the probability of a Trump-reelection. First I examine the facts that herald a Biden-victory, then those which strengthen Trump's case, and finally the factors that can push the outcome both ways.

Judging by the conventional, time-proven metrics, Trump has almost no chance of winning. It's the economy, stupid. Due to the mismanagement of the pandemic, the economy is in tatters. Unemployment is through the roof. People generally don't feel very well. They are irritated by the lockdowns, afraid of getting sick, have to deal with closed schools and dubious career-expectations, plus tired of the past four years. As far as I heard, no American president has ever won re-election under these circumstances.

Second, at almost every single poll, Biden is leading by a large, and almost unprecedently stable, margin. His lead is much stronger than Hillary's was. Whatever the fears of his opponents and the beliefs of his fans, Trump is not a wizard. He defined all expectations then, but still lost the popular vote. He snowballed to the victory thanks to a string of lucky coincidences - general discontent with the state of affairs, a widely unpopular opponent, a very divided field of Republican primaries, the last-minute announcement from the FBI to re-open the investigation into Hillary's, etc. The battle now is much more uphill for him.

In correlation with the election forecasts, his approval ratings are very bad. There is just no way to interpret his handling of the pandemic other than shockingly incompetent. By election-day, almost a quarter of a million Americans will have died in COVID. The Woodward-tapes revealed that he willfully downplayed the danger, which really is just a euphemism for the fact, that he repeatedly lied to the people and put their lives in danger. That will cost him votes, especially with the elderly.

Next point. In 2016 Trump faced an opponent the majority of the voters loathed. Biden is generally a likable character, and whatever his faults are, he just doesn't generate as much animous as Hillary did even from his detractors. In 2016 a substantial part of the voters didn't know much about Trump. Now they do more than they ever wanted. He is not a fresh new voice, the "let bring some change in"-candidate.  Plus, 4 years have passed and a new cohort of voters arrived at the scene. Among young voters, Trump was way behind Hillary. I'm not sure how many extra votes it means, but it is clearly in Biden's favor.

The final point I borrowed from Stuart Stevens, a former life-long Republican campaign strategist, who now is part of the Lincoln-project and, as a form of atonement for a life of sin, works for a Biden victory. He made the observation that Trump could win in 2016 only because of the non-white turnout was at a historical low. That certainly won't happen now, and this is the single most important decisive factor in 2020 (and by the way, for every future election as well - as more than half of the 15-year olds in America are non-white).

Now let's iterate through the facts that work for Trump. 

One of them could be if things start to get better by November. People are sensitive to the relative instead of the absolute. Even if unemployment is high, if it is moving down, and there is a hope for a soon-coming vaccine, the raising optimism will favor him.

But the only firm and reliable leverage he has is his inerodable base. It seems to be that whatever the man does (as he put it in a rare moment of honesty back in 2016, he could shoot someone on the Fifth Avenue), he wouldn't lose any voters. Blatantly obvious corruption, the pandering to white supremacists and the craziest conspiracy theories, extremely poor character, catastrophic incompetence - none of these disheartens his base. On the contrary, for many voters, he is appealing exactly because of his ugliest traits.

From here, each item in the list below can tip the scales on both sides, but each of them is much more likely to help Trump than Biden.

The riots. They are a godsend to Trump, the only reason why he can still hope for re-election. His team does everything they can to depict Sleepy Joe as secret Che Guevarra hellbent on destructing America. I honestly have no idea how it will work out. Riots and lootings never help the incumbent, but the Democrats are vulnerable to this attack, because of the far-left loonies associated to them. Biden, I think, have handled the situation well. He condemned the looting and wanton destruction swiftly, and in no uncertain terms. The jury is out.

The debates. This will be an extremely asymmetrical playing field with the odds stacked against Biden. Whatever idiotic string of word-salads Trump will blurt out on stage, he will be judged as Trump is simply being Trump. Nothing to see here. On the other hand, every slip and gaffe from Biden will be picked apart mercilessly by both the Trumpists and the undecided. However, the months-long effort of Trump to depict Biden as a vegetable can backfire in his face badly. The expectations for Biden are so low now, that if he manages to stumble to the podium with his flies zipped, he will make a good impression. And his recent performance on the Democratic Convention and in some interviews was generally surprisingly good. His convention speech was regarded by many as the best of his career. Plus, Trump is actually a very poor debater and a very predictable one even for that. The Democrats had four years to come up with a debate-strategy tailored to expose him as the malignant buffoon he is. It's expectable that someone did his or her job.

That's it. To round it up quickly and lazily, I think Biden will win decisively. If he loses, Trump will go down in history, regarded by both his fans and critics, as a raw political genius. If Trump loses badly, he will be seen as the luckiest idiot riding on an improbable wave of contingencies, and everyone will express deep disbelief that it could go on as long as it did. Such is the human tendency to see inevitability in every path taken by history in hindsight.

,

Down, down, sink them all down

In the last few months, up until a couple of weeks ago, I had been wondering what the Republican strategy would look like for November. Will they try to distance themselves from Trump, so in the very likely defeat he doesn't pull them down all the way down? That seemed at least possible. Maybe switching the candidate altogether? That was no longer an option. Had they had any intention of getting rid of Trump, they were offered the chance by the impeachment. They could have even come out of that situation as principled statesmen (and women) who used the embarrassing incumbent to drive the conservative agenda (tax cuts and the like) but drew a firm line at criminal activity. They blew that chance, and I bet some of them will passionately regret it. So in the end, I was mostly expecting them to dial down, to push black Republicans forward, things like that. I wasn't expecting the fierce doubling down. I was naive, I suppose.

The economy is in the gutters. There is not a week when Trump doesn't blurt out something idiotic and vile that harms him. The pandemic still kills a thousand people a day. So Trump and his party decided that the only way to victory is a desperate, no holds barred attack on Biden. Let's do everything we can to make people believe that Biden is a blood-thirsty anarchist hell-bent on destroying America as we know it!

That's an uphill battle, mostly against their own former efforts. The Trump team has been laboring for a year now to depict Biden as a doddering old fool. "Sleepy Joe" is not the moniker that was meant to put the fear of God in the law-abiding citizens. Second, urging people to believe that riots will rule the streets in Biden's America and Trump is the way to restore law and order, asks for suspending one's rational faculties to an extreme degree. Riots are ruling the streets now, in this very moment, in Trump's America. Not to mention voters put Trump in the White House exactly to destroy the established order, to shake up things, to disregard the norms. He was the chaos candidate then and he is the chaos president now. 

Nevertheless, this is their plan. The crazier the riots, the better for Trump. Let's stoke racial tensions and hatred. The GOP is an almost openly racist party now. Not that their members are racists, I think most of them are not, but they behave like one. The moment Kamala Harris was announced to be Biden's running mate, Trump launched an ugly warmed-up birther attack. In a not-very-coded language, they try to scare suburban voters with the invasion of low-income (that is, black or Hispanic) neighbors. To press the point, they attach Cory Booker's name to it for the only reason that Booker is black. They are trying to make a national hero of a 17-year old white vigilante, who shot and killed two protesters in Kenosha. The half-witted couple who pointed guns at BLM protesters were invited speakers at the Republican Convention.

The Convention was, by the way, in the White House, which is literally illegal. Breaking the law was combined with breaking norms, too. Secretaries of the state have traditionally kept themselves out of party politics, but it didn't stop Pompeo from giving a heartfelt love-speech to Trump. As a flagrant show of unapologetic nepotism, every member of the Trump family and their dogs (or rabid girlfriends) presented themselves. The naturalization ceremony was just a part of the show. Republicans decided to not even have a platform now. We simply want what the dear leader wants. Half of the speeches were about praising Trump, some even went so far as describing him as a most empathic and caring person. 

The convention wasn't particularly outrageous in the context of the past four years, but the gestures were still striking because they were so small time. Showing off by breaking a minor law, shameless ass-licking, pandering to the far-right. All for basically one reason - to please Trump. Apart from politics aficionados, no one watches the conventions, and those have already made up their mind.

For the public, though, the line of communication is shocking. Trump publicly and repeatedly encourages voter fraud by telling his supporters to vote twice, by mail and by person. He threatens to defund the postal service to make voting by mail harder. He refuses to denounce, and his sons openly embrace, QAnon, a crackpot conspiracy-theory movement. His team put doctored videos of Biden on social media. And he, whenever he can, encourages and escalates violence. Nothing like this has ever happened in living memory. I think we can't even register the scale of the waste Trump lays on America and the world as well.

As for the moderate conservative media, anodyne reprimands are the most the National Review is capable of churning out, in the vein of "[...] it’d be even better if the president didn’t purport to have powers that he doesn’t." The rest of their time they half-heartedly spend on trying to see Biden as the vessel of the far-left or musing on the dangers of socialism. Or on the moral degeneration of abortion-supporters. In. Every. Single. Issue. Bunch of cowards and pretentious dicks. I've [expletive] stopped reading them.